21. Ott MA mais aussi al., The newest trade-regarding anywhere between hormonal contraceptives and you will condoms certainly one of teenagers, Views with the Sexual and you can Reproductive Fitness, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
twenty-two. Wilson EK and you can Koo Hp, Contacts anywhere between reasonable-money ladies’ matchmaking functions and their birth-control explore, Point of views towards the Sexual and you can Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC mais aussi al., Friends and you may friend intimacy to adolescent sexual couples in link to condom have fun with, Record away from Teenage Wellness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA et al., The newest developmental relationship away from matchmaking quality, hormonal birth control options and you may condom non-fool around with among adolescent feminine, Log away from Adolescent Health, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and you may Sherblom J, Relational connection and threats in order to matchmaking fix desires: affects with the condom play with, Log off American School Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty-seven. Manning WD mais aussi al., Young mature dating relationship while the management of sexual risk, Society Research and you may Policy Comment, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty-eight. Manlove J mais aussi al., Teen moms and dads from inside the promote worry: exposure situations and outcomes for teens as well as their pupils, Research Short term, Arizona, DC: Child Styles, 2011.
30. DiClemente RJ mais aussi al., Sexual exposure practices with the having old sex lovers: an examination of black teenage females, Sexually Sent Sickness 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty two. Fortenberry JD ainsi que al., Condom fool around with since a purpose of amount of time in new and you can dependent teenage sexual relationships, American Journal away from Social Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Exposure and protective things associated with transition to help you a first sexual relationship with a mature spouse, Record off Teenage Wellness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Contraception explore habits around the teens’ sexual dating, papers presented at the yearly conference of People Organization off America, Philadelphia, .
35. Manning WD, Giordano Pc and you may Longmore MA, Linking: the connection contexts regarding “nonrelationship” sex, Diary off Teenage Browse, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
thirty six. Carlson MJ and you can Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results of multiple-hitched virility for parental resources and you may relationship, report shown at the annual fulfilling of your Association to have Societal Rules Investigation and you may Government, Washington, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you can Graefe DR, Finding a mate? The fresh new marital and you can cohabitation histories from unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and you may Wolfe B, eds., Away from Wedlock: Causes and you may Outcomes out-of Nonmarital Fertility, Nyc: Russell Sage Base, 2001, pp. 317–343.
40. Kirby D, Emerging Answers 2007: Look Conclusions into the Software to minimize Adolescent Maternity and you may Sexually Sent Illness, Arizona, DC: National Campaign to end Teen and you will Unexpected Maternity, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The fresh new impression away from apps to improve contraceptive have fun with among mature female: a glance at fresh and you will quasi-experimental knowledge, Views with the Sexual and you can Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Associations
Jennifer Manlove was program area manager and you may older look researcher, Kate Welti is actually search researcher, Age Wildsmith is senior browse researcher and Megan Barry is lookup specialist, all at Youngster Style, Bethesda, MD.
Background
In the first analysis, which used a region-area take to regarding teens inside Kansas, Manning and colleagues nine grouped matchmaking functions with the you to definitely index out of positive properties (for example close self-disclosure, intimate like and matchmaking salience) and one list from bad functions (eg disagreement and you may nonexclusivity). They found that high scores with the possibly directory was of the quicker condom feel. Descriptive analyses as well as suggested you to a mix of highest positive and you will higher negative ratings try in the faster condom consistency.
In per bullet, members have been expected “Because big date of history interview, have you been inside a dating relationship where you envision out-of yourself included in several?” We experienced participants to settle an internet dating relationships once they replied yes assuming the newest spouse is actually a current relationship lover, instead of a spouse, cohabiting mate or former lover. Same-sex dating relationship and the ones in which the respondent had in earlier times cohabited into the partner was basically omitted. Overall, cuatro,013 participants said a current relationships matchmaking throughout the 2002–2005. Of kept respondents, 553 weren’t on attempt in the series of interest, step 1,876 was cohabiting otherwise hitched, and you will 2,542 had no latest relationship matchmaking. Respondents within our sample was basically aged 18–twenty-six.
Relationships union was predicated on a couple procedures. The first is actually a 0–ten scale in which participants ranked the possibility which they and the partner could be together when you look at the six months. A rating off no indicated absolutely no way; an excellent 10 indicated 100% opportunities. I classified this possibilities while the lowest (below six), typical (6–9) otherwise high (10). For the next measure of connection, we integrated a changeable to possess whether or not the few had chatted about relationship otherwise cohabitation; responses were categorized as the chatted about none, discussed cohabitation otherwise talked about matrimony. (Participants exactly who advertised having chatted about both cohabitation and you can relationships were integrated on the wedding category.)
Heterogeneous birth-control outcomes inside long term relationships can also help identify all the way down birth control texture into the offered adolescent dating, even with higher likelihood of previously-usage of contraceptives. thirty two, 33 Previous studies have translated that it interested in because of the positing one partners are prepared to sporadically forgo contraceptive use in much more serious matchmaking; 32, 34 although not, our show advise that less contraception fool check this around with is concentrated when you look at the long-er title relationship described as large dispute minimizing connection.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you will Pleck JH, The new figure away from younger men’s condom fool around with through the and you will across the dating, Family members Considered Perspectives, 1994, 26(6):246–251.